26–28 May 2021 • Paris/France
26–28 May 2021 • Paris/France
Every paper is rated by each reviewer. The papers and the posters are rated exactly the same way. If the abstract clearly represents significant industrial bias: 0 points are assigned, means rejection.
There will be 3 reviewers and they can indicate if the abstract is from their own group and they cannot score it. The final score is therefore averages and corrected for the number of reviewers
From one group only 2 abstracts can be accepted for oral presentation. The two highest scoring abstracts will be chosen for oral presentation and the others will be redirected to the poster section.
If an author is not able to present his abstract and withdraws it from oral presentation, the highest ranking abstract that was not chosen for oral presentation nor Mario Boni poster session is invited for oral presentation.
Oral Communications and Poster that are not Clinical Cases or works of Basic or Experimental Sciences
a) Interest in the subject:
b) Study design / Level of evidence:
c) Quality of the methodology (adequate sample size, statistical analysis, quality of presentation):
Basic or Experimental Sciences Works:
a) Interest in the subject:
b) Study design / Level of evidence:
c) Quality of the methodology (adequate sample size, statistical analysis, quality of presentation):
Clinical cases:
a) Interest in the subject:
b) Study design / Level of evidence:
c) Quality of the methodology (adequate sample size, statistical analysis, quality of presentation):